Washington Times Telemarketing

I was working late yesterday, and I got a call from a telemarketing lady around 6:30PM trying to sell me Washington Times newspaper. I guess I never bothered to register my office number in the "do not call" list. After her sales speach, here's how the conversation took place.

Me: "Do you know who you're calling?"
Sales Lady: "No, I don't"
Me: "This is the office of The Washington Post"
Sales Lady: "Ahhh.....the competition"
Me: "Yeah, sorry, I don't think I'd be buying your newspaper, I don't think my job would appreciate that"
Sales Lady: Slight laugh, "I understand, have a good night"
Me: "You too"

Just thought it was somewhat weird, and share it with you guys.

Dancing Chicken

Today I randomly came across this site. It's Burger King commercial causing "awareness" of their new chicken sandwiches. It's a webcam of a dancing chicken. You can type in commands and the chicken follows it.

Since I doubt there's actually someone there dancing 24/7 and reading your commands and doing them, it's probably some pretty good programming behind it. It recognizes simple commands such as "sit", "scratch", "dance" and such. I've also tried more complex commands, and it followed some. I was impressed by it following the "kick the couch" command.

Danny Sullivan leaving SEW & SES

For those who is knows anything about search marketing, this is truly the end of an era. One of the founding fathers of search engine marketing, Danny Sullivan, is no longer going to write for Search Engine Watch or host Search Engine Strategies. Is SEW and SES going to be the "industry authority" forum and conference in the next few years without Danny? I guess we will have to wait and see.

Does anyone know what he wanted from Incisive Media that they wouldn't give him? Not to sound too much like a fanboy, but the image of having "Danny Sullivan" in the company itself is probably worth whatever he asked for.

First Date Disasters: Once More

So I went on the first date with this girl last weekend on Sunday night, and we grabbed some drinks in DC, then walked and chilled out at Dupont Circle, which is a circle about the size of two basketball courts, with benches around it and a fountain in the middle. We sat on one of the benches, talked for an hour or so, I held her in my arms while we talked, things were going well. We called it a night around 11:30PM and made plans of me seeing her again on Tuesday, and I will pick her up from work (she works 15 min away from my place).

I called her to confirm plans, and asked her to Email me her work address. She asked me where we were going, and my reply was "I don't know, we'll decide when I pick you up". To my surprise, she said "that's not good enough, call me when you have decided where we're going" and hang up on me.

Wow, that was rude. She later on called and left me a voicemail apologizing for it, and I was out so I didn't hear her calling me. To be honest, I don't know if I would've picked up anyway if I heard it.

The next day, she sent me an Email apologizing for it.

"Hey Paul,

I'm still feeling like a bitch here, so I thought I'd drop you a note and explain myself. First, I'll say I shouldn't have hung up on you. That was rude on my part, and there's no excuse for it. But I have to say when I asked you to tell me where you wanted to go by yesterday, I did so for several reasons. And when you said you didn't know or care where we were going... that we would just figure it out when you got here, it sounded a bit as if you're of the "whatever I, Paul, say goes" mindset. Personally, I'm not of that mindset; I don't take orders well. I also think it's much too soon to assume I'm willing to go to some unknown destination in your car with you.

So, again, I'm sorry for hanging up on you. But I was serious about having a day's notice of arrangements before I would go out again.

Joy"

I was in a bad mood at the time due to Google dropping some of my blog's pages into Supplemental Results (Yeah, some of the weirdest things annoy me) so I sent her a polite but not friendly Email back.

"When I said that, I meant "WE can decide when we meet up" as in we'll make that decision together. Just like you not taking orders well, I also don't. So "Get back to me when you decide on something" just isn't going to work, sorry. Remember we were talking about drama in life, and I'm definitely willing to sacrifice happiness to not have drama in life? Well, this is one of the cases.

I wish you the best with everything.

--Paul."

The message was pretty obvious, and she took it maturely. She sent me one last Email and that was the end of it.
"Cool. Best to you, too.
Joy"

Philosophical question here: Am I wrong to "cut people I don't believe should be my friends out of my life"? Or do I just have too high of standards on who I associate myself with? I don't think my standards are too high, just want people in my life that're consider to others and don't play games, and I will give them the same respect. Are all girls spoiled by guys who would do anything to be around them? If so, I blame the guys who get treated like dirt by girls because that "trains" the girls to believe they can treat me the same way and I'll put up with it.

Volunteering in Northern Virginia

I do something nice for other people every once in a while for absolutely no reason. Well, not "absolutely no reason", it could be boredom or Karma building.

I have exchanged a few Emails from "Northern Virginia Family Service", and I am going to start volunteering for them. They have a class where adults go there to learn the skills to get better jobs so they don't have to work in entry-level jobs for the rest of their lives. The class teaches speaking, computers, job searching, resume writing, interviewing, and other type of skills of that nature. It's a class Mon-Fri 8AM-2PM for 22 weeks. By statistics, over 90% of adults who graduate obtain "better" jobs.

I visited them today during lunch. The majority of the students in that class are foreign. I remember when I was young and new to the US, my parents had help from other Chinese people to "point them the way" in their careers back in Long Island. But what if there was nobody to help them with anything? I can definitely imagine this class being extremely beneficial for foreigners who don't totally understand the US customs and work culture. Nobody else will tell them "during a job interview, when asked why leaving the current job, don't complain about the low pay or about the current boss".

Due to my fulltime job, I can only participate in this about two days a week, 8-9AM (before work), but I'd love to participate more, if the experience turns out to be rewarding.

Philosophical Question: Is it still considered an "unselfish act" if the sole purpose of an act is to make me feel better about myself, bored and give myself something to do, or building karma for myself?

Typo Online Marketing

Today I found a typo (highlighted) on WashingtonPost.com’s local homepage (page is served to local IP addresses), where they misspelled a word in the caption of the front image. They spelled Schools "Shools".

That got me interested; I know there’s a lot of marketing around common misspelled words, such as googel.com (redirects to google.com), but I never knew the same type of marketing was true for typo’s. There actually is a Shools.com all about online schools.

Guess I learn something new everyday.

Product Placement: Smallville

I was just watching an old episode of Smallville today, Tivoed it a few weeks ago, and really noticed repetitive product placement of AOL. It was the episode of the little girl having powers to move and break glass, and every time someone used a computer, they were using AOL. The whole episode is all about giving the impression “sophisticated users use AOL”, from Lex’s incoming video (AOL Video) to Chloe’s investigations (AOL white pages) to a half second flash of AOL’s welcome screen.

With new technology such as Tivos, fast forwards, and automatic commercial skips, this could be the future of TV advertising.

AOL Search Query Log

Earlier this year, the US government wanted data on search queries from search engines. Most search engines gave up their data without a fight, Google was one of the only ones, if not the only search engine, to say "No, I'm not going to give it to you".

AOL was one of the companies that just handed the government search query data. For some reason, they made the information public over the weekend. This is just my random guess, but were they thinking "If everyone has the same data the government does, it would make the data less valuable and therefore we didn't give the US government something that we aren't willing to give to the public"? The AOL screennames were changed into random number ID's.

Enough people were concerned about it to make AOL no longer post the data, and officially say "It was a mistake and a data leak, we had no intentions of sharing that data".

Of course, no-one can protect any information after it's made public, and many people hosted the data on their own servers after downloading from AOL. Here're some places you can get AOL data(500 MB).

Andrew Simmering

So I was having a chat with my friend Andrew Simmering and we were discussing how the NFL and NBA websites are different. His favorite team, the Cleveland Browns, has its own domain at clevelandbrowns.com, while my favorite NBA team has to be a sub-domain on nba.com (nba.com/knicks)

It’s not just our favorite teams; it’s all NFL and NBA teams. Why is it that NFL teams get their own domain URL’s and NBA teams don’t? I’d appreciate a “fan site” at knicks.com or something, but it’s just a redirect to nba.com/knicks. Now annoying is that?

But on the brighter note, a lot of people watch NBA here, instead of "Go Duke, Go Carolina". The worse NBA team would probably beat the best NCAA team, why wouldn't people watch a sport at its best with the most talented players? I DO understand NCAA try harder, but the NBA teams can beat them with 70% effort. Is the theory behind watching NCAA games "I'm not that great at basketball, I'd like to watch a team play more closer to my skills"?